Archive for February, 2010

Why are our Municipal Elections in May?

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

In Mount Holly, our form of government is Council-Manager as per the Faulkner Act (link). The municipal elections are Non-Partisan and held in May. A Non-Partisan election in theory attempts to limit partisan politics at the local level but that is hardly the case in any of the 86 local governments in New Jersey that are so-called non-partisan.

Although the intent is for these elections to be non-partisan, that is hardly the case here either. In Mount  Holly candidates do run under a slogan and not by political affiliation, but politics has everything to do with it. In our small town there is a Republican “establishment” that dates back decades. Candidates are handpicked by the republican bosses and the campaigns are funded with money from republican organizations and political action committees. That’s in addition to the tens of thousands of campaign dollars  that law firms and engineers, who have contracts with our government, contribute.

A law was just passed that allows our township to move the election to November and keep it non-partisan. Basically there would be a separate part of the ballot for candidates separate from political parties on the November ballot. Candidates would continue to run under a slogan as they now do in the May election. With a greater voter turnout and  saving tax papers money by moving the election to November, it would seem that this bill would benefit Mount Holly in a time when State funding is being cut and voter turnout in May is so low.  But Town Council is ignoring these benefits and pushing to opt out of this opportunity. Mount Holly residents have brought this issue to the Township Council, and each time the Council has disregarded the possibility despite the facts.  With the Council Members disinterest and the special interest’s feeding their elections, a socially and financially strained Mount Holly is now able to confront these issues with state legislation to back it up.  They say you either gain power through one of two things: money or people.  Our local government may be able to afford this Pay-to-Play system, but the residents of Mount Holly cannot. 

Read more about this topic in our future posts.

-Truth

Mt. Holly, home of the highest paid public employee in Burlington County

Friday, February 19th, 2010

The following are excerpts from a story by Inquirer Staff Writer Maya Rao

William Dunn is among the highest-paid utilities executive directors in N.J.

With a salary of $190,000 William G. Dunn is the highest-paid local government employee in Mount Holly, home to the Burlington County administration building and courthouse that serve a population of nearly a half-million people.

But Dunn, 83, does not prosecute criminal cases or administer county operations.

His employer resides one street over, and is far more obscure: the Mount Holly Municipal Utilities Authority.

Every time they flush a toilet or wash the dishes, the authority’s 13,119 ratepayers in Mount Holly and the surrounding communities of Hainesport, Moorestown, Lumberton, Westampton, and Eastampton are contributing to what Dunn, the authority’s executive director, calls “my little sphere of influence.”

That sphere is immortalized at 37 Washington St. in the form of the William G. Dunn Administration Building, dedicated in 2002.

Now, as it has been for decades, his life is the authority. It is a modest operation with a budget of $13 million and a payroll of 60. Dunn nevertheless has launched an outsize career from here in all matters sewage.

He has worked for the MUA since 1962 – first as a board member and chairman, and for 30 years full-time as executive director – and is among the highest-paid government utilities executive directors in New Jersey.

His salary exceeds that of not only any county employee down the street (the highest paid is the prosecutor, who earns $165,000) but also, in a more direct comparison, those of the executive directors of larger utilities authorities.

At the comparably sized Willingboro MUA, the executive director makes $132,500, and in Mount Laurel, with some 18,000 ratepayers, Dunn’s counterpart earns $125,000. In Evesham, the executive director was making $122,000 when he retired last month from the 16,000-customer MUA.

At the Camden County Utilities Authority, with 150,000 customers, the executive director makes $159,877. At the Gloucester County Utilities Authority, it’s $109,766.

In New Jersey’s most populous county, the head of the Bergen County Utilities Authority, with about 540,000 residential ratepayers, earns $131,400.

Dunn’s most substantial undertaking now is overseeing the construction of a new treatment plant in Lumberton, set for completion in 2011.

Residential usage rates have doubled in the last decade – the authority says this is a result of higher costs for insurance, chemicals, and electricity, and the expense of the new plant – though officials note that they are lower than in many surrounding areas.

“What’s caught our attention and we’re getting comments about have been not only the size of the increases but the frequency that we are getting,” Moorestown resident Bill Parker, speaking for a condo association, told the authority at a 2007 hearing on a rate increase, part of which took effect in 2008.

During the same hearing, resident Walt Simpson urged the authority to keep its “belt tight.”

“If we keep it any tighter, we won’t be able to breathe,” replied board chairman John Edwards.

Yet the salaries of Dunn and his administrative staff – which are set by the board – steadily rose during the same period. Dunn’s salary is up 50 percent from 2000, when he was making $117,104. The deputy director of finance and the plant operations manager were making about $50,000 at the start of the decade; now their salaries are around $100,000.

Dunn said that the union employees receive a 4 percent raise each year, and that the administrative staff should receive similar amounts. Officials noted a previous problem with turnover, saying they wanted to retain good employees.

“All I can say is they’re doing a good job and we’ve been fair with it,” Dunn said.

The MUA created a position in 2004 for an assistant executive director, whose salary has increased some 40 percent since then to $100,506. Dunn said the board wanted to have someone trained to be his successor.

When that transition might occur is another matter. Now a week shy of his 84th birthday, Dunn doesn’t want to quit.

-end story

***According to the APP database  Mr. Dunn makes $190,ooo per year and has over 30 years in the pension.

The Hudson County MUA is 40 times the size of Mt. Holly MUA yet the Exec. Dir. there makes $60,000 less then Dunn. Dunn also has the distinction of being paid more than our Township Manager, Chief of Police, County Administrator, Sheriff, BCC President and the Governor. No wonder the guy can afford to eat at The Robin’s Nest every day and has his own chair there.

Did you know:
Mr. Dunn happens to be a former Mt. Holly Councilman and it should come as no surprise that all the MHMUA board members are all current council members, past council members or politically connected to council. And of course members of the MHMUA are all appointed by Mt. Holly Town Council.

More to come on the Patronage Pit known as MHMUA

-Truth

Candidates?

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Rose Krebs

Burlington County Times   Feb 14, 2010

MOUNT HOLLY – Candidates wishing to seek two open four-year Township Council seats can pick up nominating petitions at the municipal clerk’s office.

The deadline is 4 p.m. March 18 to submit petitions to clerk Kathy Hoffman at the municipal building on Washington Street. Candidates must secure 46 eligible signatures from township voters on the petitions.

The council seats of Mayor Jules Thiessen and Brooke Tidswell III will be up for grabs in the May 11 election. Thiessen was first elected to the five-member council in 1994 and is serving his fourth term. Tidswell was elected in 1998 and is serving his third term.

The township operates under a nonpartisan system, with elections in May and reorganization in July. Although the election is nonpartisan, candidates are supported financially by partisan groups. Thiessen and Tidswell have received Republican-backing.

At recent meetings, the topic of changing the election to November has been discussed, but council members have yet to get behind the idea. In January a bill passed in the state Legislature was signed into law that enables municipalities to hold nonpartisan elections in November. Before that, a switch from May to November would have required changing to a partisan system.

It costs about $35,000 for the township to hold a municipal election in May, Hoffman said. At a recent council meeting, Thiessen said he is concerned that changing to a November election – with county, state and national races – would take focus off the local election.

Original BCT story

Welcome to MountHollyTruth.com

Friday, February 19th, 2010

The purpose of this site is to expose the truth. The truth about where our hard earned tax dollars really go. The wasteful spending is out of control and we the taxpayers are paying for it.

Feel free to register and comment on the site. Email any story ideas to mtholly.truth@gmail.com

Inappropriate comments will be deleted.

To stand in silence when they should be protesting makes cowards out of men.
-Abraham Lincoln